<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: www. is not deprecated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yes-www.org</link>
	<description>really</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:44:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Øystein Jakobsen</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Øystein Jakobsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-714</guid>
		<description>Turns out, wordpress only understood one of the four correctly, which was www.fribit.no. (hmm will it understand the period properly...I...can&#039;t...tell...)

It does however add &quot;http&quot; unneccesarily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out, wordpress only understood one of the four correctly, which was <a href="http://www.fribit.no" rel="nofollow">http://www.fribit.no</a>. (hmm will it understand the period properly&#8230;I&#8230;can&#8217;t&#8230;tell&#8230;)</p>
<p>It does however add &#8220;http&#8221; unneccesarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Øystein Jakobsen</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Øystein Jakobsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Lets do a test. 

Will wordpress understand and hyperlink www.fribit.no or www.fribit.no? (with a question mark directly behind it) Probably yes. 

Will wordpress understand and hyperlink fribit.no or fribit.no? Probably no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets do a test. </p>
<p>Will wordpress understand and hyperlink <a href="http://www.fribit.no" rel="nofollow">http://www.fribit.no</a> or <a href="http://www.fribit.no?" rel="nofollow">http://www.fribit.no?</a> (with a question mark directly behind it) Probably yes. </p>
<p>Will wordpress understand and hyperlink fribit.no or fribit.no? Probably no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth Sayer</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth Sayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 01:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Honestly, this whole argument is just as retarded as all other internet arguments. You see; normal people don&#039;t give a damn about this site&#039;s (or any other site&#039;s) opinions about it (hell; it&#039;s not like anyone will care about what I&#039;m saying either).

It&#039;s a simple fact of life; nobody gives a damn about this, so why give a damn about it? It&#039;s not like typing www will cause a nuclear melt-down underneath the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, this whole argument is just as retarded as all other internet arguments. You see; normal people don&#8217;t give a damn about this site&#8217;s (or any other site&#8217;s) opinions about it (hell; it&#8217;s not like anyone will care about what I&#8217;m saying either).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a simple fact of life; nobody gives a damn about this, so why give a damn about it? It&#8217;s not like typing www will cause a nuclear melt-down underneath the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all visual. I think www is ok but sometimes a bit confusing. Anyway in my personal opinion www must live forever. I really like my site to see this way &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.capivarasstudio.com&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.capivarasstudio.com&lt;/a&gt; than &lt;a href=&#039;http://capivarasstudio.com&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;capivarasstudio.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all visual. I think www is ok but sometimes a bit confusing. Anyway in my personal opinion www must live forever. I really like my site to see this way <a href='http://www.capivarasstudio.com' rel="nofollow">http://www.capivarasstudio.com</a> than <a href='http://capivarasstudio.com' rel="nofollow">capivarasstudio.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Interested to see that Twitter is no-www.

However, if you search Google for &quot;Twitter&quot;, Google displays http://www.twitter.com (yes-www) in their listing, but this redirects to http://twitter.com (no-www).

Does that mean Twitter have wrongly configured the www preference option in webmaster tools?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested to see that Twitter is no-www.</p>
<p>However, if you search Google for &#8220;Twitter&#8221;, Google displays <a href="http://www.twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com</a> (yes-www) in their listing, but this redirects to <a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com</a> (no-www).</p>
<p>Does that mean Twitter have wrongly configured the www preference option in webmaster tools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A normal computer user on the internet</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>A normal computer user on the internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>This is such a fucked-up pile of retarded shit; even the owner of this site doesn&#039;t know how the internet works &amp; he has the balls to point out other retards like him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a fucked-up pile of retarded shit; even the owner of this site doesn&#8217;t know how the internet works &amp; he has the balls to point out other retards like him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 04:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>The whole concept of www. is stupid.

the http:// protocol exists for a reason.

If you want to view a website in your browser, you would go to http://website.com/.
If you want to access a server via ftp, you would go to ftp://website.com/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole concept of www. is stupid.</p>
<p>the http:// protocol exists for a reason.</p>
<p>If you want to view a website in your browser, you would go to <a href="http://website.com/" rel="nofollow">http://website.com/</a>.<br />
If you want to access a server via ftp, you would go to <a href="ftp://website.com/" rel="nofollow">ftp://website.com/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Short addition: yes, I wrote &quot;subdomain&quot;. 

It&#039;s the &quot;subdomain&quot; pointing to the root of your &quot;publicly accessible directory&quot;.
That&#039;s why you should use the &quot;www.&quot; prefix, and why dropping that &quot;www.&quot; prefix is preferred when using other subdomains like &quot;my.example.com&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short addition: yes, I wrote &#8220;subdomain&#8221;. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the &#8220;subdomain&#8221; pointing to the root of your &#8220;publicly accessible directory&#8221;.<br />
That&#8217;s why you should use the &#8220;www.&#8221; prefix, and why dropping that &#8220;www.&#8221; prefix is preferred when using other subdomains like &#8220;my.example.com&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>* applause *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* applause *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>People, 
PROTOCOLS ARE NOT DIRECTORIES!

I read people&#039;s talk about protocols and &quot;ftp. &amp; www.&quot; contra &quot;ftp:// &amp; http://&quot; and I really have to wonder what the hell they think they are talking about. If you don&#039;t know what you&#039;re saying, better keep you mouth closed.

An example for your information:

http://www.example.com/help/index.html?id=123#top

&lt;strong&gt;http://&lt;/strong&gt; is the protocol
&lt;strong&gt;www&lt;/strong&gt; is the subdomain
&lt;strong&gt;example.com&lt;/strong&gt; is the domain
&lt;strong&gt;/help/&lt;/strong&gt; is the directory
&lt;strong&gt;index.html&lt;/strong&gt; is the filename
&lt;strong&gt;?id=123&lt;/strong&gt; is the query string
&lt;strong&gt;#top&lt;/strong&gt; is the anchor (or hash)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People,<br />
PROTOCOLS ARE NOT DIRECTORIES!</p>
<p>I read people&#8217;s talk about protocols and &#8220;ftp. &amp; www.&#8221; contra &#8220;ftp:// &amp; http://&#8221; and I really have to wonder what the hell they think they are talking about. If you don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re saying, better keep you mouth closed.</p>
<p>An example for your information:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.example.com/help/index.html?id=123#top" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com/help/index.html?id=123#top</a></p>
<p><strong>http://</strong> is the protocol<br />
<strong>www</strong> is the subdomain<br />
<strong>example.com</strong> is the domain<br />
<strong>/help/</strong> is the directory<br />
<strong>index.html</strong> is the filename<br />
<strong>?id=123</strong> is the query string<br />
<strong>#top</strong> is the anchor (or hash)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.057 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-04 05:05:03 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
