<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for www. is not deprecated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yes-www.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yes-www.org</link>
	<description>really</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:44:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www. is not deprecated by Øystein Jakobsen</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Øystein Jakobsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-714</guid>
		<description>Turns out, wordpress only understood one of the four correctly, which was www.fribit.no. (hmm will it understand the period properly...I...can&#039;t...tell...)

It does however add &quot;http&quot; unneccesarily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out, wordpress only understood one of the four correctly, which was <a href="http://www.fribit.no" rel="nofollow">http://www.fribit.no</a>. (hmm will it understand the period properly&#8230;I&#8230;can&#8217;t&#8230;tell&#8230;)</p>
<p>It does however add &#8220;http&#8221; unneccesarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www. is not deprecated by Øystein Jakobsen</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Øystein Jakobsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Lets do a test. 

Will wordpress understand and hyperlink www.fribit.no or www.fribit.no? (with a question mark directly behind it) Probably yes. 

Will wordpress understand and hyperlink fribit.no or fribit.no? Probably no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets do a test. </p>
<p>Will wordpress understand and hyperlink <a href="http://www.fribit.no" rel="nofollow">http://www.fribit.no</a> or <a href="http://www.fribit.no?" rel="nofollow">http://www.fribit.no?</a> (with a question mark directly behind it) Probably yes. </p>
<p>Will wordpress understand and hyperlink fribit.no or fribit.no? Probably no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www. is not deprecated by The Truth Sayer</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth Sayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 01:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Honestly, this whole argument is just as retarded as all other internet arguments. You see; normal people don&#039;t give a damn about this site&#039;s (or any other site&#039;s) opinions about it (hell; it&#039;s not like anyone will care about what I&#039;m saying either).

It&#039;s a simple fact of life; nobody gives a damn about this, so why give a damn about it? It&#039;s not like typing www will cause a nuclear melt-down underneath the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, this whole argument is just as retarded as all other internet arguments. You see; normal people don&#8217;t give a damn about this site&#8217;s (or any other site&#8217;s) opinions about it (hell; it&#8217;s not like anyone will care about what I&#8217;m saying either).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a simple fact of life; nobody gives a damn about this, so why give a damn about it? It&#8217;s not like typing www will cause a nuclear melt-down underneath the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www. is not deprecated by gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all visual. I think www is ok but sometimes a bit confusing. Anyway in my personal opinion www must live forever. I really like my site to see this way &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.capivarasstudio.com&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.capivarasstudio.com&lt;/a&gt; than &lt;a href=&#039;http://capivarasstudio.com&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;capivarasstudio.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all visual. I think www is ok but sometimes a bit confusing. Anyway in my personal opinion www must live forever. I really like my site to see this way <a href='http://www.capivarasstudio.com' rel="nofollow">http://www.capivarasstudio.com</a> than <a href='http://capivarasstudio.com' rel="nofollow">capivarasstudio.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Redirection by Thomas B. D.</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/redirection/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas B. D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/redirection/#comment-512</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve experienced, the effect of using www.domain.tld is that users tend to prepend www. to ANY and ALL subdomain URL&#039;s you&#039;ll send them.

E.g. &quot;Just go to mail.mydomain.com...&quot; user does this: &quot;www.mail.mydomain.com&quot; which, first of all, doesn&#039;t work and, second, makes no sense.

I prefer without &#039;www&#039; since it saves typing and &#039;www&#039; has nothing to do with my website.

Imagine these examples:

mydomain.tld
img.mydomain.tld
mail.mydomain.tld
cdn.mydomain.tld

In order of appearance:

Website
Image host
Webmail
Content Delivery Network host.

Makes sense in my head, and &#039;www.&#039; wouldn&#039;t make any sense here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve experienced, the effect of using <a href="http://www.domain.tld" rel="nofollow">http://www.domain.tld</a> is that users tend to prepend www. to ANY and ALL subdomain URL&#8217;s you&#8217;ll send them.</p>
<p>E.g. &#8220;Just go to mail.mydomain.com&#8230;&#8221; user does this: &#8220;www.mail.mydomain.com&#8221; which, first of all, doesn&#8217;t work and, second, makes no sense.</p>
<p>I prefer without &#8216;www&#8217; since it saves typing and &#8216;www&#8217; has nothing to do with my website.</p>
<p>Imagine these examples:</p>
<p>mydomain.tld<br />
img.mydomain.tld<br />
mail.mydomain.tld<br />
cdn.mydomain.tld</p>
<p>In order of appearance:</p>
<p>Website<br />
Image host<br />
Webmail<br />
Content Delivery Network host.</p>
<p>Makes sense in my head, and &#8216;www.&#8217; wouldn&#8217;t make any sense here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www. is not deprecated by Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Interested to see that Twitter is no-www.

However, if you search Google for &quot;Twitter&quot;, Google displays http://www.twitter.com (yes-www) in their listing, but this redirects to http://twitter.com (no-www).

Does that mean Twitter have wrongly configured the www preference option in webmaster tools?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested to see that Twitter is no-www.</p>
<p>However, if you search Google for &#8220;Twitter&#8221;, Google displays <a href="http://www.twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com</a> (yes-www) in their listing, but this redirects to <a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com</a> (no-www).</p>
<p>Does that mean Twitter have wrongly configured the www preference option in webmaster tools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www. is not deprecated by A normal computer user on the internet</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>A normal computer user on the internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>This is such a fucked-up pile of retarded shit; even the owner of this site doesn&#039;t know how the internet works &amp; he has the balls to point out other retards like him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a fucked-up pile of retarded shit; even the owner of this site doesn&#8217;t know how the internet works &amp; he has the balls to point out other retards like him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www. is not deprecated by Damon</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 04:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>The whole concept of www. is stupid.

the http:// protocol exists for a reason.

If you want to view a website in your browser, you would go to http://website.com/.
If you want to access a server via ftp, you would go to ftp://website.com/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole concept of www. is stupid.</p>
<p>the http:// protocol exists for a reason.</p>
<p>If you want to view a website in your browser, you would go to <a href="http://website.com/" rel="nofollow">http://website.com/</a>.<br />
If you want to access a server via ftp, you would go to <a href="ftp://website.com/" rel="nofollow">ftp://website.com/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www. is not deprecated by Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Short addition: yes, I wrote &quot;subdomain&quot;. 

It&#039;s the &quot;subdomain&quot; pointing to the root of your &quot;publicly accessible directory&quot;.
That&#039;s why you should use the &quot;www.&quot; prefix, and why dropping that &quot;www.&quot; prefix is preferred when using other subdomains like &quot;my.example.com&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short addition: yes, I wrote &#8220;subdomain&#8221;. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the &#8220;subdomain&#8221; pointing to the root of your &#8220;publicly accessible directory&#8221;.<br />
That&#8217;s why you should use the &#8220;www.&#8221; prefix, and why dropping that &#8220;www.&#8221; prefix is preferred when using other subdomains like &#8220;my.example.com&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on www. is not deprecated by Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</title>
		<link>http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi™)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yes-www.org/www-is-not-deprecated/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>* applause *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* applause *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.059 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-04 05:03:10 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
