Comments on: Will Google ban you for not using www? http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/ really Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:44:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: alexjohnc3 http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-108 alexjohnc3 Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:50:23 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-108 Tia, you're a few years late: http://www.google.com/search?q=wordlog :P Tia, you’re a few years late: http://www.google.com/search?q=wordlog
:P

]]> By: Tia Reyes http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-107 Tia Reyes Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:26:20 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-107 I dont think www. has anything to do with it. Maybe some competitor pointed many bad links to the site and that got it banned? I dont think www. has anything to do with it. Maybe some competitor pointed many bad links to the site and that got it banned?

]]> By: Site Indexed http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-106 Site Indexed Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:35:57 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-106 www has nothing to do with the site being indexed. Google views www like a subdomain and that's it. Look at your PR with www and look at it without, it differs. www has nothing to do with the site being indexed. Google views www like a subdomain and that’s it. Look at your PR with www and look at it without, it differs.

]]> By: alexjohnc3 http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-103 alexjohnc3 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 06:49:12 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-103 LoLo--by that logic (i.e., we should "follow the lead of the big-boys") we shouldn't support web standards either, since Yahoo and Google both fail validation and only MSN's homepage passes validation as far as I know (they do this to look good). Following what Google, Yahoo, and MSN do isn't a very good idea necessarily and it ignores the reasons for No-WWW. LoLo–by that logic (i.e., we should “follow the lead of the big-boys”) we shouldn’t support web standards either, since Yahoo and Google both fail validation and only MSN’s homepage passes validation as far as I know (they do this to look good). Following what Google, Yahoo, and MSN do isn’t a very good idea necessarily and it ignores the reasons for No-WWW.

]]> By: LoLo http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-102 LoLo Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:46:17 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-102 I was just looking in the SEO issue of the whole thing and decided that with www. might be a little better. Why? Google some highly fought over keywords: Insurance, single word "adult terms", etc. Most of the first page listings (in some cases all) use the www prefix. And; visiting Yahoo, Google and MSN without the www. all redirected. I think following the lead of the big-boys is a pretty good idea on this issue. As far as WordLog being banned for going without, I think not. Google isn't perfect. This was probably just a screw up. And, this post is a bit dated. If you look now they she is indexed. I was just looking in the SEO issue of the whole thing and decided that with www. might be a little better.

Why? Google some highly fought over keywords: Insurance, single word “adult terms”, etc. Most of the first page listings (in some cases all) use the www prefix.

And; visiting Yahoo, Google and MSN without the www. all redirected. I think following the lead of the big-boys is a pretty good idea on this issue.

As far as WordLog being banned for going without, I think not. Google isn’t perfect. This was probably just a screw up. And, this post is a bit dated. If you look now they she is indexed.

]]> By: AlexJohnc3 http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-101 AlexJohnc3 Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:26:00 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-101 Obviously not, Google just happens to have some problems that we have yet to figure out. I completely agree with Jon Dowland, www. is not a protocol and therefore should not be implimented in websites. Unless you send mail to "person@mail.gmail.com" (no-www.org example). Oh well. Obviously not, Google just happens to have some problems that we have yet to figure out.

I completely agree with Jon Dowland, www. is not a protocol and therefore should not be implimented in websites. Unless you send mail to “person@mail.gmail.com” (no-www.org example). Oh well.

]]> By: Jon Dowland http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-100 Jon Dowland Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:05:49 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-100 Considering that you come to the conclusion that "No, it won't", and the source was a random person's idle speculation in a comment, it seems like sensationalism to title this post as you do. I've come here for the first time to see the arguments in favour of a www. prefix in the modern world, and have left with an impression that there are no concrete ones. Considering that you come to the conclusion that “No, it won’t”, and the source was a random person’s idle speculation in a comment, it seems like sensationalism to title this post as you do. I’ve come here for the first time to see the arguments in favour of a www. prefix in the modern world, and have left with an impression that there are no concrete ones.

]]> By: Oliver http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-99 Oliver Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:44:59 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-99 No way. WWW's have been known to be deprecated since long ago, and the theories around it have been quite solidly positive. No way. WWW’s have been known to be deprecated since long ago, and the theories around it have been quite solidly positive.

]]> By: ACJ http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-97 ACJ Tue, 31 May 2005 20:00:04 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-97 That is not it. My personal site has a page rank of 7, and it doesn't have a www prefix. That is not it. My personal site has a page rank of 7, and it doesn’t have a www prefix.

]]> By: Mathias Bynens http://www.yes-www.org/2005/05/19/will-google-ban-you-for-not-using-www/#comment-98 Mathias Bynens Tue, 31 May 2005 15:35:46 +0000 http://www.yes-www.org/?p=6#comment-98 <blockquote> Will Google ban you for not using www?</blockquote> You wish.

Will Google ban you for not using www?

You wish.

]]>